MacMusic  |  PcMusic  |  440 Software  |  440 Forums  |  440TV  |  Zicos
archive
Recherche

Neil Gaiman, Cory Doctorow And Other Authors Publish Open Letter Protesting Publishers' Lawsuit Against Internet Archive Library

vendredi 30 septembre 2022, 02:45 , par Slashdot
A group of authors, including Neil Gaiman, Naomi Klein, and Cory Doctorow, 'are lending their names to an open letter protesting publishers' lawsuit against the Internet Archive Library, characterizing it as one of a number of efforts to curb libraries' lending of ebooks.' From the report: A group of publishers sued the Internet Archive in 2020, claiming that its open library violates copyright by producing 'mirror image copies of millions of unaltered in-copyright works for which it has no rights' and then distributes them 'in their entirety for reading purposes to the public for free, including voluminous numbers of books that are commercially available.' They also contend that the archive's scanning undercuts the market for e-books. The Internet Archive says that its lending of the scanned books is akin to a traditional library. In its response to the publishers' lawsuit, it warns of the ramifications of the litigation and claims that publishers 'would like to force libraries and their patrons into a world in which books can only be accessed, never owned, and in which availability is subject to the rightsholders' whim.'

'Libraries are a fundamental collective good. We, the undersigned authors, are disheartened by the recent attacks against libraries being made in our name by trade associations such as the American Association of Publishers and the Publishers Association: undermining the traditional rights of libraries to own and preserve books, intimidating libraries with lawsuits, and smearing librarians,' the letter states. The letter also calls for enshrining 'the right of libraries to permanently own and preserve books, and to purchase these permanent copies on reasonable terms, regardless of format,' and condemns the characterization of library advocates as 'mouthpieces' for big tech. 'We fear a future where libraries are reduced to a sort of Netflix or Spotify for books, from which publishers demand exorbitant licensing fees in perpetuity while unaccountable vendors force the spread of disinformation and hate for profit,' the letter states.

The American Association of Publishers' general counsel Terrence Hart issued a statement responding to the claim that the lawsuit is an attack on libraries. He said, 'That authors and publishers support libraries is not in dispute and most certainly not at issue in the infringement case against the Internet Archive, which is not a library. 'On the contrary, the Internet Archive operates an unlicensed digital copying and distribution business that copies millions of literary works without permission and gives them away for free. This activity is unprecedented and outside any reasonable interpretation of the copyright law that grants to authors the decision as to whether, when, through whom, and on what terms to distribute their works to the public.' He added, 'If the rights holder chooses to permit the copying of print books into e-books, that is a choice they are empowered to make as to their own works. The Internet Archive robs authors and publishers of that choice.'

Read more of this story at Slashdot.
https://news.slashdot.org/story/22/09/29/2159252/neil-gaiman-cory-doctorow-and-other-authors-publish...
News copyright owned by their original publishers | Copyright © 2004 - 2024 Zicos / 440Network
Date Actuelle
jeu. 28 mars - 20:23 CET