MacMusic  |  PcMusic  |  440 Software  |  440 Forums  |  440TV  |  Zicos
adobergb
Recherche

Ask Slashdot: Why Don't HDR TVs Have sRGB Or AdobeRGB Ratings?

mercredi 12 décembre 2018, 02:00 , par Slashdot
dryriver writes: As anyone who buys professional computer monitors knows, the dynamic range of the display device you are looking at can be expressed quite usefully in terms of percentage sRGB coverage and percentage AdobeRGB coverage. The higher the percentage for each, the better and wider the dynamic range of the screen panel you are getting. People who work with professional video and photographs typically aim for a display that has 100 percent sRGB coverage and at least 70 to 80 percent AdobeRGB coverage. Laptop review site Notebookcheck for example uses professional optical testing equipment to check whether the advertised sRGB and AdobeRGB percentages and brightness in nits for any laptop display panel hold up in real life. This being the case, why do quote-unquote 'High Dynamic Range' capable TVs -- which seem to be mostly 10 bits per channel to begin with -- not have an sRGB or AdobeRGB rating quoted anywhere in their technical specs? Why don't professional TV reviewers use optical testing equipment that's readily available to measure the real world dynamic range of HDR or non-HDR TVs objectively, in hard numbers? Why do they simply say 'the blacks on this TV were deep and pleasing, and the lighter tones were...' when this can be expressed better and more objectively in measured numbers or percentages? Do they think consumers are too unsophisticated to understand a simple number like 'this OLED TV achieves a fairly average 66 percent AdobeRGB coverage?'

Read more of this story at Slashdot.
rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/NP0qLwrNb3E/ask-slashdot-why-dont-hdr-tvs-have-srgb-or-adob...
News copyright owned by their original publishers | Copyright © 2004 - 2024 Zicos / 440Network
Date Actuelle
ven. 22 nov. - 02:49 CET