Judge Uses ChatGPT To Make Court Decision

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Motherboard: A judge in Colombia used ChatGPT to make a court ruling, in what is apparently the first time a legal decision has been made with the help of an AI text generator -- or at least, the first time we know about it. Judge Juan Manuel Padilla Garcia, who presides over the First Circuit Court in the city of Cartagena, said he used the AI tool to pose legal questions about the case and included its responses in his decision, according to a court document (PDF) dated January 30, 2023.

'The arguments for this decision will be determined in line with the use of artificial intelligence (AI),' Garcia wrote in the decision, which was translated from Spanish. 'Accordingly, we entered parts of the legal questions posed in these proceedings.' 'The purpose of including these AI-produced texts is in no way to replace the judge's decision,' he added. 'What we are really looking for is to optimize the time spent drafting judgments after corroborating the information provided by AI.'

The case involved a dispute with a health insurance company over whether an autistic child should receive coverage for medical treatment. According to the court document, the legal questions entered into the AI tool included 'Is an autistic minor exonerated from paying fees for their therapies?' and 'Has the jurisprudence of the constitutional court made favorable decisions in similar cases?' Garcia included the chatbot's full responses in the decision, apparently marking the first time a judge has admitted to doing so. The judge also included his own insights into applicable legal precedents, and said the AI was used to 'extend the arguments of the adopted decision.' After detailing the exchanges with the AI, the judge then adopts its responses and his own legal arguments as grounds for its decision.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.