Amazon 'Cannot Claim Shock' That Bathroom Spycams Were Used as Advertised, Judge Says

An anonymous reader shares a report: After a spy camera designed to look like a towel hook was purchased on Amazon and illegally used for months to capture photos of a minor in her private bathroom, Amazon was sued. The plaintiff -- a former Brazilian foreign exchange student then living in West Virginia -- argued that Amazon had inspected the camera three times and its safety team had failed to prevent allegedly severe, foreseeable harms still affecting her today.

Amazon hoped the court would dismiss the suit, arguing that the platform wasn't responsible for the alleged criminal conduct harming the minor. But after nearly eight months deliberating, a judge recently largely denied the tech giant's motion to dismiss. Amazon's biggest problem persuading the judge was seemingly the product descriptions that the platform approved. An amended complaint included a photo from Amazon's product listing that showed bathroom towels hanging on hooks that disguised the hidden camera. Text on that product image promoted the spycams, boasting that they 'won't attract attention' because each hook appears to be 'a very ordinary hook.'

Because 'Amazon approved product descriptions suggesting consumers use' the spycam 'to record private moments in a bathroom,' US district judge Robert Chambers wrote, 'Amazon cannot claim shock when a consumer does just that.' 'These allegations raise a reasonable inference Amazon sold a camera knowing it would be used to record a third party in a bathroom without their consent,' Chambers wrote.

Read more of this story at Slashdot.