Google's New Foldable Smartphone Reviewed By a YouTube Tester, an Android Blog, and iFixit

Google's describes their new Gemini-powered foldable phone as 'an epic display of Google AI' (also calling it 'unfoldgettable').

The Android Authority blog says the phone is 'impressive,' 'incredibly thin' — and, at $1,800, expensive.

But long-time Slashdot reader mprindle notes some complaints from the YouTube channel JerryRigEverything ('known for in-depth testing of phones and other devices'.) The blog 9to5Google summarizes some of the video's findings:

- When exposed to dirt and sand, we hear the hinge start grinding since there's no dust protection...

- A closed bend test reveals no problems for the Pixel 9 Pro Fold, but the issues arise when it's open and bent from the back. Despite the left/right back panels meeting and covering the spine of the hinge, 'there doesn't appear to be a whole lot of resistance.'

'Not sure why Google thought it was a good idea to put an antenna line right here at the weakest point in an already thin frame,' the video notes (arguing it's 'like putting an exhaust port in the Death Star...')

But they also tell their 8.8 million subscribers that 'One cool thing that Google has done is that they've made every single part of this metal frame from recycled aluminum.' And 'Out of the box, I'm already a huge fan of how it looks,' the video begins. 'It feels amazing, and folds completely shut and appears like the hardware has finally caught up to the folding form factor to where it looks just natural.'

One thing to note... 'Moving to the inner display, I start to get the vibe that when Google says 'super durable', they mean 'regular durable', since the inner display is made from the same soft flexible plastic that we've seen on every folding phone so far, which scratches at level two. Even fingernails can leave very permanent marks on the center screen. This is absolutely normal for a folding phone, though, and really not too big of a deal if you take care it, making sure there are no bits of dust or dirt in the screen when you close it will go a long way to keeping things pristine, since there's not a lot of room between the two halves.'

iFixit makes an interesting observation: 'Over half of the phone's internal area is occupied by the lithium polymer battery cells!' (They've also created another teardown video available on YouTube.)

'There's no denying that the inner screens are delicate and prone to damage,' according to an accompanying iFixit blog post, 'and the mechanical nature of the hinge mechanism provides additional avenues for dust and liquid ingress that may eventually become a problem.'

But it also applauds 'the less obvious repairability wins, from repair guides and a detailed Bill of Materials to spare parts that are available without malicious restrictions... [T]he Pixel team has gone to great lengths to support your right to repair the device you paid for and own' — and from Day One.
There's really only a single criticism I'd direct at the Pixel 9 Fold from my own disassembly experience: the battery removal tabs. These tabs simply do not work, with or without the application of heat. They are flimsy and break often, require a second pair of hands to secure the device, and they fail to cut through adhesive reliably. Whether they should even try to cut through adhesive is debatable. Stretch release adhesive might age and break over time but at least they give you a chance at removing the adhesive. Pull tabs don't even work when the adhesive is brand new, they literally have no redeeming qualities when compared to other battery release mechanisms. Even the more robust pull tabs Samsung uses in its phones work better than this, though they aren't necessarily the easiest to use either.
As for the device itself, it prompted one of my colleagues — an iPhone user since forever — to say 'this is nice, I'd switch to Android for this'... Setting aside the downsides of owning a foldable smartphone, I am excited to see Google and the Pixel team devoting so much time and energy towards improving the overall repairability of the device. The effort is seen and appreciated by device owners and as a technician, I look forward to seeing how manufacturers will continue to innovate for repairability.

Slashdot reader mprindle reminds us that when it comes to waterproofing, the JerryRigEverything video 'noted that the footnotes say the device is rated IP68 yet the Sim tray is rated at IPx8.'

Read more of this story at Slashdot.