Navigation
Recherche
|
Science Editors Raise New Doubts on Meta's Claims It Isn't Polarizing
vendredi 27 septembre 2024, 23:20 , par Slashdot
Such criticisms of peer-reviewed research often appear below papers in academic journals, but Science's editors felt their editorial was needed to more prominently caveat this original paper's conclusions, said Holden Thorp, Science's editor in chief. 'It was incumbent on us to come up with a way somehow that people who would come to the paper would know of these concerns,â Thorp said in an interview. While no correction was warranted, he said, 'There's an election coming up, and we care about people citing this paper.' Meta said it had been transparent with researchers about its actions during the time of the study, and the company and its research partners say it had no control over the Science paper's conclusions. Meta called debates of the sort aired on Thursday as part of the research process. Read more of this story at Slashdot.
https://tech.slashdot.org/story/24/09/27/2027221/science-editors-raise-new-doubts-on-metas-claims-it...
Voir aussi |
56 sources (32 en français)
Date Actuelle
mer. 16 oct. - 16:23 CEST
|