Internet Users Ask FCC To Ban Data Caps

An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica: It's been just a week since US telecom regulators announced a formal inquiry into broadband data caps, and the docket is filling up with comments from users who say they shouldn't have to pay overage charges for using their Internet service. The docket has about 190 comments so far, nearly all from individual broadband customers.

Federal Communications Commission dockets are usually populated with filings from telecom companies, advocacy groups, and other organizations, but some attract comments from individual users of telecom services. The data cap docket probably won't break any records given that the FCC has fielded many millions of comments on net neutrality, but it currently tops the agency's list of most active proceedings based on the number of filings in the past 30 days. 'Data caps, especially by providers in markets with no competition, are nothing more than an arbitrary money grab by greedy corporations. They limit and stifle innovation, cause undue stress, and are unnecessary,' wrote Lucas Landreth.

'Data caps are as outmoded as long distance telephone fees,' wrote Joseph Wilkicki. 'At every turn, telecommunications companies seek to extract more revenue from customers for a service that has rapidly become essential to modern life.' Pointing to taxpayer subsidies provided to ISPs, Wilkicki wrote that large telecoms 'have sought every opportunity to take those funds and not provide the expected broadband rollout that we paid for.'

In response to Trump-appointed FCC Commissioner Nathan Simington's coffee refill analogy, internet users 'Jonathan Mnemonic' and James Carter wrote, 'Coffee is not, in fact, internet service.' They added: 'Cafes are not able to abuse monopolistic practices based on infrastructural strangleholds. To briefly set aside the niceties: the analogy is absurd, and it is borderline offensive to the discerning layperson.'

Read more of this story at Slashdot.