Navigation
Recherche
|
Facebook Asks US Supreme Court To Dismiss Fraud Suit Over Cambridge Analytica Scandal
mercredi 6 novembre 2024, 21:50 , par Slashdot
At issue is whether Facebook broke the law when it failed to detail the prior data breach in subsequent business-risk disclosures, and instead portrayed the risk of such incidents as purely hypothetical. Facebook argued in a supreme court brief that it was not required to reveal that its warned-of risk had already materialized because 'a reasonable investor' would understand risk disclosures to be forward-looking statements. 'When we think about these questions, we're not looking only to lies or complete false statements,' the liberal justice Elena Kagan told Kannon Shanmugam, the lawyer for Facebook. 'We're also looking to misleading statements or misleading omissions.' The conservative justice Samuel Alito asked Shanmugam: 'Isn't it the case that an evaluation of risks is always forward-looking?' 'It is. And that is essentially what underlies our argument here,' Shanmugam responded. The plaintiffs accused Facebook of misleading investors in violation of the Securities Exchange Act, a 1934 federal law that requires publicly traded companies to disclose their business risks. They claimed the company unlawfully withheld information from investors about a 2015 data breach involving British political consulting firm Cambridge Analytica that affected more than 30 million Facebook users. Edward Davila, a US district judge, dismissed the lawsuit but the San Francisco-based ninth US circuit court of appeals revived it. The supreme court's ruling is expected by the end of June. Read more of this story at Slashdot.
https://yro.slashdot.org/story/24/11/06/2046230/facebook-asks-us-supreme-court-to-dismiss-fraud-suit...
Voir aussi |
56 sources (32 en français)
Date Actuelle
sam. 23 nov. - 08:57 CET
|