How CodeRabbit brings AI to code reviews

Code reviews have always been one of the more loathsome duties in software engineering. Most developers would much rather be writing code than reviewing it. Most code reviews occur late in the development cycle, and are inconsistently applied, limited by the capacity of human coders. 

For today’s developers, code review workflows are getting even harder, because developers no longer check code only inside their own repos. Engineers have to understand shifting dependencies, external APIs, version changes, and upstream logic beyond the current branch. So it’s easy to miss problems like out-of-date function usage, missing unit tests for recently updated logic, or logic drift across services or teams. And missing these types of issues during reviews leads to regressions, broken APIs, and other messy production problems.

CodeRabbit, an AI-powered code reviewer, aims to both lighten the burden of code reviews for developers and to improve their quality and consistency. CodeRabbit plugs into GitHub and other Git platforms, integrates with IDEs like Visual Studio Code, and runs real-time analysis on pull requests. Drawing on all the content of the repo for context, CodeRabbit combines code graph analysis and the power of large language models (including OpenAI’s GPT-4.5, o3, and o4-mini, and Anthropic’s Claude Opus 4 and Sonnet 4) to identify issues in code changes, suggest improvements, and generate those improvements in a new branch.

Developers familiar with code review products have likely used linters, static analysis tools, and rule-based checkers that flag syntax errors or enforce formatting. CodeRabbit has built-in config files for dozens of open-source linters with best practices and various static checks already configured. These are passed on as part of the LLM prompt along with various other ways in which CodeRabbit adds context to the code being reviewed.

Alternatively, you have the option to replace CodeRabbit’s built-in checks with your own configuration file instead. In that case, CodeRabbit will include the checks that your linter config has into the LLM prompt that it generates. However configured, CodeRabbit provides the context-aware feedback on pull requests your organization needs, dramatically reducing the manual effort required for code reviews, and at the same time improving their effectiveness.

Here’s a brief tour of CodeRabbit’s capabilities.

Line-by-line AI reviews with committable suggestions and one-click fixes

CodeRabbit’s foundational capability is its continuous, context-aware pull request (PR) analysis. Once a PR is opened, CodeRabbit launches a full AI-powered review, surfacing actionable feedback without human involvement. The experience blends static review conventions with natural language explanations and inline suggestions.

When a developer submits a PR, the AI immediately flags issues and recommends changes (e.g., returning a 404 instead of a 400 error code).

These are presented as committable suggestions, i.e., semantic diffs the user can apply with a single click.

The PR cannot be merged until every comment is acknowledged or resolved, enforcing quality without micromanagement.

CodeRabbit identifies a mismatched error status code.
CodeRabbit

Multi-tool static analysis integrated, not isolated

One of CodeRabbit’s more differentiated offerings is how it integrates more than 35 linters and static code scanners directly into its review pipeline. Linters are just one important part of the whole content enrichment and multi-layered code review that CodeRabbit provides. Rather than forcing developers to configure each tool manually or juggle results across dashboards, CodeRabbit brings these into a single workflow.

Pre-built integrations for RuboCop, ESLint, SQLFluff, and others, with one-click configuration.

Security-sensitive patterns (e.g., hard-coded credentials, open Amazon S3 buckets) are surfaced in a unified Findings dashboard.

Teams can upload custom YAML to preserve unique standards across projects.

CodeRabbit dashboard showing issues found by multiple linters and static code scanners.
CodeRabbit

Learning engine that adapts to team conventions

Where traditional code review tools enforce rigid rules, CodeRabbit learns. Its Learnings engine captures team-specific patterns, whether explicitly defined or inferred from previous feedback, and uses them to tailor future reviews.

CodeRabbit automatically detects style preferences (e.g., no wildcard imports) and retains them for future enforcement.

Reviewers can input style conventions in plain English, which CodeRabbit interprets and applies.

This memory operates at the repository or org level and reduces “nitpick” comments over time.

CodeRabbit creates custom review instructions from your chat conversation.
CodeRabbit

Code reviews at the speed of AI

CodeRabbit reflects a broader shift in how code is reviewed as human reasoning alone struggles to keep up. AI-generated code, sprawling repositories, and cross-team dependencies are pushing traditional review practices to the limit. By integrating linters and static checks directly into language model prompts, CodeRabbit delivers context-rich suggestions that combine structured analysis with natural language understanding. This new approach enables machines to reason alongside developers and enforce quality at a scale humans could not manage alone.

CodeRabbit is not a replacement for human reviewers but it is a deeply knowledgeable, always-available assistant that improves over time. For teams drowning in PRs, bogged down by review debt, or simply looking to evolve how they enforce quality, CodeRabbit presents a compelling case to upgrade one of the last manual domains in the CI/CD pipeline.

—

New Tech Forum provides a venue for technology leaders—including vendors and other outside contributors—to explore and discuss emerging enterprise technology in unprecedented depth and breadth. The selection is subjective, based on our pick of the technologies we believe to be important and of greatest interest to InfoWorld readers. InfoWorld does not accept marketing collateral for publication and reserves the right to edit all contributed content. Send all inquiries to doug_dineley@foundryco.com.